The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta has proposed changes to its policy on conscientious objection by requiring all doctors to provide “effective referrals”.

The College licenses and regulates doctors in the province. It has the power to investigate and discipline any doctors who do not follow the College’s policies.

Albertans can share their views on this proposed change until January 15. This is an opportunity to stand up for ethical, conscientious doctors. We offer some advice on how to do so at the end of this article.

Proposed ‘Conscientious Objection’ Policy

The College’s proposed policy would require doctors to clearly state their conscientious objection, to provide accurate information about available services, and to continue providing care for a patient as long as required. But it would also require doctors to “proactively maintain an effective referral plan for the frequently requested services they are unwilling to provide.” Similarly, it requires members not to “expose patients to adverse clinical outcomes due to a delayed effective referral.” In other words, although the policy does not require doctors to provide objectionable services (such as abortion or physician-assisted death), it requires them to facilitate a patient’s timely access to such services.

Effective Referral

Currently, only Ontario and Nova Scotia explicitly require an effective referral, with Alberta set to become the third if this policy is adopted. While the CPSA does not define ‘effective referral,’ others have defined it as “Taking positive action to ensure the patient is connected to a non-objecting, available, and accessible physician, other health-care professional, or agency.” Essentially, an ‘effective referral’ requirement ensures that a doctor facilitates euthanasia or abortion by connecting a patient with a doctor or resource that will help the patient receive the requested service. Effective referral policies violate doctors’ consciences and undermine our healthcare system. You can read more about effective referral and why it is a concern here.

Participate in the Consultation

Any Albertan can provide feedback directly to the College. There are two ways to do so. First, you can fill in a comment box on the College’s website and select whether to make your comment public or not. Second, you can fill out a brief survey, consisting of 14 questions – just be aware that the survey touches various aspects of the proposed policy besides effective referral. Choose the option that is best for you and share your thoughts by January 15, 2024.

Suggested Talking Points

Here are some talking points that you can use to help form a response to the consultation.

Once again, please send your thoughts to the College by January 15, 2024. We encourage you to use the ideas in this article, expand on them, and present them in your own words.

**Update**

As of January 11, 2024, the College has updated its consultation page with the following:

“Based on initial feedback received, the term ‘effective referral’ will be removed from the Conscientious Objection standard. Those that provide feedback during the consultation period will be consulted again during the re-consultation phase and see additional edits before final approval.”

While we have yet to see what a revised policy looks like, the decision to remove the term ‘effective referral’ is a promising development for which we can be thankful. We encourage you to still weigh in on the proposed policy, and also support the College in their decision to remove the term ‘effective referral.’ 

The issue of conscience in Ontario needs your attention.
staging.arpacanada.ca/conscience

To sign up, visit staging.arpacanada.ca/conscience

When I started getting involved with ARPA, and even more so when I began working at ARPA, one phrase has been particularly drilled into my memory. I’m sure you’ve heard it too – ‘relationships first, policy second.’

On Monday, December 5, ARPA Canada hosted a lunch reception for MPPs at Queen’s Park with the intent of focusing on ‘relationships first, policy second.’ Although we have hosted similar receptions for our federal representatives, this reception was ARPA’s first ever reception for provincial politicians and their staffers. The main purpose of the reception was simply to meet and greet MPPs and their staff. Ontario is at the beginning of a new legislative session following the election this past summer, so it was the perfect time to introduce ourselves to new and returning MPPs and their staff.

And we had a great turnout! In total, we had around 50 guests, in addition to a few ARPA staff and chapter members. Our guests included various MPPs and staff from both MPP offices and provincial ministry offices. Guests represented both government and opposition parties. We had the opportunity to tell them what ARPA is and what we do and to ask them about their jobs, priorities, and general interest in politics.

Where opportunities arose, we also brought up various policy issues. For this event, we wanted to focus on three of ARPA’s priority issues in Ontario over the next year. One of these priorities is family law. We provided several policy documents on this issue, advocating for policies based on biblical principles which will benefit children and families throughout the province. A second focus was on freedom of conscience for medical professionals and advocacy for provincial legislation to protect conscience rights. Finally, we provided information on Down Syndrome, seeking to persuade MPPs to ensure that expectant parents who receive a Down Syndrome diagnosis for their pre-born child receive accurate information and proper support. These documents were included in a small package for our guests, and over 30 of them were distributed to MPPs and staff from the various offices.

We are thankful for this opportunity to get to know many new names and faces and to show them a brief snapshot of ARPA’s work. We’ll continue to seek to build these relationships into 2023 and to keep you up to date on our issues of focus and how you too can get involved!